Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pubusi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 00:20, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pubusi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources bar a single New York Times article, which is insufficient to establish notability. A newspaper article that mentions a social practice only briefly and in passing isn't a basis for a whole article. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 06:32, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:44, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:55, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:55, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:35, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree there are insufficient sources that establish WP:N. All that can seem to be found is that single reference that just doesn't meet the criteria. LandonRules ^(Talk) 15:29, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.